A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair simply seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never change the underlying specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal internet site is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions posting about René Collier famous which the businessman experienced Beforehand been linked to nearby advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from incredibly diverse professional backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via midsection-substantial water in the course of a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an excessive strategy.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the legal costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre from the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.